Sep 11 – 13, 2025
Campus Luigi Einaudi
Europe/Rome timezone

Assessing Discriminant Validity in Clinical Psychology: Combining Exploratory Graph Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling

Sep 12, 2025, 9:40 AM
20m
Aula A1 (Pareto)

Aula A1 (Pareto)

Speaker

Anna Panzeri (Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italia)

Description

Background: Discriminant validity (DV) is present when two measures of similar, yet distinct constructs exhibit a correlation that is sufficiently low to consider them as distinct. Multiple strategies exist for evaluating DV, but recent recommendations highlighted Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) as a robust approach, although contemporary techniques such as Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) also offer significant insights.
Methods: This study combines EGA and SEM in evaluating DV for four instruments whose DV had not previously been established: the Uncertainty in Illness Questionnaire (UIQ), Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-Revised (IUS), Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and General Anxiety Disorder 7-items (GAD-7), all utilized within the DIPPS project.
Results: First, EGA (1,000 parametric bootstraps) on the items of all four measures successfully identified the underlying dimensions, with all stability indices exceeding 0.85. No problematic EGA cross-loadings emerged, further confirming DV among the scales.
Then, using SEM latent correlations with 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals were estimated freely among the measures, with all values remaining below the threshold of 0.85, thereby supporting the presence of DV (RMSEA= .050, SRMR= .055; CFI= .992; UIQ~~IUS = 0.532, 95%CI[0.518, 0.546]; UIQ~~PSWQ = .553, 95%CI[.521, .546]; UIQ~~GAD-7= .489, 95%CI[.472, .505]; PSWQ~~IUS= 0.708, 95%CI[0.696, 0.719]; IUS~~GAD-7= 0.561, 95%CI[0.546, 0.577]; PSWQ~~GAD-7= .758, 95%CI[.745, .771]).
Conclusions: The preliminary application of EGA to DV assessment produced outcomes consistent with those from confirmatory SEM, suggesting that modern network-based methods represent effective integrations into traditional approaches. This combined performance underscores the potential for contemporary methods to integrate established practices in psychometrics.

If you're submitting a symposium talk, what's the symposium title? Innovations in psychometric modelling: New approaches to understanding psychological measurement

Primary authors

Anna Panzeri (Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italia) Gioia Bottesi (Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova) Prof. Marta Ghisi (Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italia) Prof. Giulio Vidotto (Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italia) Andrea Spoto (Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale - Università di Padova)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.